Author: Mark Young
Date: 13:24:00 12/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 1998 at 15:36:07, Ralph E. Carter wrote: >On December 09, 1998 at 15:47:57, Mark Young wrote: > >>On December 09, 1998 at 08:35:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On December 09, 1998 at 06:36:02, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>Many of use have played over the games of Deep Blue Vs GM Kasparov , and Rebel >>>>10 Vs GM Anand. >>>> >>>>My question is what do you think would be the stronger chess program, and by how >>>>much: >>>> >>>>Deep Blue, or Rebel 10 (K6 450Mhz) * 1000 >>> >>> >>>this question makes no sense. >> >>You miss the point of the question, but thats ok. >> >> In the two longer games Rebel had no real chance, >> >>Ok, If Rebel or any current top program could run 1000 times faster, Would it >>then have a chance in a match with Kasparov or Anand. And would that chance be >>better or worse then the last version of Deep Blue. IYO. > >If frogs had pockets... >Did you read my previous post? Your question makes *no* sense. >The technology is *not* available. *I* have studied the matter. >These off-hand hypotheticals go nowhere. The question has nothing to do with technology, or if this technology will ever be available at anytime in the future. This is a hypothetical and has not a right or wrong answer. If you don't wish to give your opinion on this hypothetical, that is fine with me. But don't give me this bs that the question makes no sense. It did to everyone else that wished to give their opinion. I could understand if the question was not clearly a hypothetical, but it is hypothetical and I was only interested in the opinions that address the point of the question. > >> >> >>>while deep blue won the match it played. You aren't going to see a rebel*1000 >>>in the next hundred years, probably. Because technology is nowhere near even >>>thinking about machines with picosecond cycle types. The technology to produce >>>such technology doesn't exist yet... >>> >>>The next problem is that a special-purpose piece of hardware will *always* be >>>orders of magnitude faster than general-purpose hardware, so that if we wait for >>>a 1000x faster rebel, we get a 10000x faster deep blue in the process...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.