Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 18:38:06 03/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 14, 2004 at 21:14:47, Mike Byrne wrote: >I get a shorter mate with 3....Rh2 using backward analsysis > > white black > 1 Ka4 Rh2 > 2 Nh5+ Rb2 > 3 Nf6 Rh2 > 4 Bg7 Rg2 The PV I posted suggested 4...Rc2 instead of Rg2. After Rg2 I get a shorter mate, too. How can I undrstand your usage of "I get a shorter mate with 3....Rh2 using backward analsysis"? Do you get a mate score in the position after 3...Rh2? So, can I consider this a proven mate? Regards, Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.