Author: Steven Edwards
Date: 14:23:32 03/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 15, 2004 at 16:52:40, martin fierz wrote: >On March 15, 2004 at 16:38:53, Steven Edwards wrote: >>Hmmn. Maybe I should offer a wager or two here to the doubters. Like, if I >>can't get this to work, then I'll stop complaining about the mundane nature of >>traditional A/B searchers; if I do get it too work, each doubter can send me a >>new battery for one of my Macintosh notebooks. (Approx. US$150 each.) > >i'll accept the wager, but you have to define "can't get this to work" a bit >more clearly for me. e.g. IIRC your list had an item "become world champion", >and i would accept that you had "got it to work" long before that. >for me, the getting it to work part has to be spelled out as some kind of rating >level - what do you think? what level would you specify? Well, first let's hope our board sponsor won't get upset with a little gambling. I posted the primary and secondary goals back last month but can't find the CCC reference. So you are welcome to read them again from the entry 2004.02.19 in my journal: http://www.livejournal.com/users/chessnotation/ Point #8 in the primary goal set (combined with #12) is what I claim to be sufficient for proof of concept, and I'll make the output public for inspection.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.