Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SOMCS [kind of OT]

Author: martin fierz

Date: 14:23:41 03/15/04

Go up one level in this thread


On March 15, 2004 at 15:28:55, Tord Romstad wrote:

>On March 15, 2004 at 14:30:58, Vasik Rajlich wrote:
>
>>Yeah, actually the book was very good - but not for the reason Watson was hoping
>>for. You roll your eyes once per page when the "it's all about calculation"
>>comment inevitably comes up - and look at the games, conveniently organized by
>>the basic patterns ... :-)
>
>Is it a book you would recommend even for us lowly patzers, or is it the kind
>of book you won't understand a word of unless you are a really strong player?
>
>Tord

i don't know how lowly a patzer you are, but it is certainly a thought-provoking
book. on the other hand, as an engine author you are probably looking for rules
to implement in your eval function, and you won't find any in this book - that
is watson's dogma - there are no rules...

cheers
  martin



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.