Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 03:46:16 03/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2004 at 06:41:56, Steven Edwards wrote: >On March 16, 2004 at 06:31:58, Sune Fischer wrote: >>On March 15, 2004 at 18:44:39, Steven Edwards wrote: >>>On March 15, 2004 at 05:48:05, Sune Fischer wrote: >>>>On March 15, 2004 at 05:06:09, Steven Edwards wrote: >>> >>>>Wouldn't it be possible to construct a simple testbed to quickly try out a few >>>>of the ideas and see if they have merrit? >>> >>>No. There is too much foundation work needed to get even a simple plann >>>exercise to work. >> >>It should be possible to pick a position, analyze the kind of features that is >>needed to find the best move and try it out. > >No. There are two different flavors of programming here: > >1. Assembling the entire pattern and planning framework. > >2. Building the pattern/plan library. > >Item #1 is an all or nothing proposition. Only item #2 can be done >incrementally. I'm afraid that I agree, it is an all or nothing approach. The problem is that 'all' is a lot to code ;) -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.