Author: Peter Berger
Date: 14:23:22 03/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 15, 2004 at 22:28:24, Uri Blass wrote: >I do not agree with the last claim that Genius was somewhat unlucky. > >I understood that Genius could score better in the game that it lost with more >time but I guess that movei also could score better in the games that it lost >with more time. This was (and still is) just my personal opinion from watching the games - there is not enough data of course, as matches like these are pretty uncommon. I might do another one later. >>Most interesting game so far was definitely the 4th game, but actually nothing >>really thrilling happened so far. > >Yes > > >I suspect that movei missed a win somewhere but I could not find it in a short >analysis. > >Maybe capturing with the bishop at f6 could be better because of the idea Rh8# >but I did not see how to use that idea to win the game. > The opening (and the whole early middlegame) was very interesting too. Genius has quite some knowledge to make up for its missing search depth. It's unfortunate that it isn't possible to show the opponent's evals in a post game report - it's sometimes very revealing. But at the longer time control Movei certainly does a lot better against Genius, as was expected. I am curious about future results with this time control (btw, Movei will win its 30 0 match against Shredder hands down ;) ). Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.