Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 14:34:07 03/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2004 at 17:28:06, Jasmine Baer wrote: >I own Fritz 8, Hiarcs 9, Junior 8, Chess Tiger 15, Shredder 7, and Shredder 8, >and I run them on a Pentium 4 2.8c GHz with Hyper-Threading. I am pretty happy >with the performance, as I can work in many apps while having the PC analyze a >game or even play online. > >I am thinking of building a "chess only" machine since the aforementioned P4 is >also used for other important work-related and household management tasks. I am >amazed at how much performance one can get for a little over $1,000! > >Should I... > >(a) Build a dual Athlon MP system (2600s) >(b) Build a dual Xeon system (2.66 GHz) >(c) Build an Athlon XP 3200+ system >(d) Build an Athlon 64 3200 or Athlon 64 3400 system > >Where can I get the biggest bang for my buck? I could put together a very good >XP 3200 system for about $800, and the dual Xeon system would set me back around >$1,400 or so. The dual MP and the Athlon 64 3400 would cost about the same, >somewhere in the $1,000 to $1,200 range. I'm willing to spend the $$ for the >system that is "best" (i.e. - can go deepest quickest). > >I truly enjoy reading the responses. When it comes to chess+computers, there is >no other group that knows more - except for the poster that told me I shouldn't >waste so much electricity... LOL! And, hey. I'll admit it. I want to have a >kick-butt PC so that the engines I own can perform well at www.playchess.com. >So yes, there is a bit of ego involved - why spend hours optimizing a book for >an engine, only to be let down by your hardware? > >Thanks, folks. > >-Erik if you will use Dual-capable engbines build the dual MP. I think it will be faster for chess than the Dual-Xeon-System you mentioned. regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.