Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:29:15 03/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 2004 at 03:59:16, Joachim Rang wrote: >On March 16, 2004 at 18:58:46, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>See this thread: >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?354948 > >wait, wait... > >The continuation Rxf6 Qxf6 Re1 Qf5 Qxf5 gxf5 Bxd5 leads to a better endgame for >white. If a GM tells me, that this endgame is won for white I believe him right >away. I do not. This is the mistake of trusting authority. GM got their rating because of games otb and not because of being better in analysis with the help of computers. We have no evidence that they know better that somebody who analyzed the position with computers. In case that I analyze the position for many hours(something that I did not do) I believe that white is winning only if I see some wins against the engines in this endgame. This endgame is also not forced and there are other lines that black can choose that lead to a similiar endgames. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.