Author: Mikael Bäckman
Date: 02:17:43 03/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2004 at 17:52:05, Sune Fischer wrote: >On March 16, 2004 at 16:21:23, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >> The idea is that a move that is good at ply 15 might also be good at ply 3... >> >>And vice-versa... > >However, local beats global in my tests :) > >Just a single test position to depth 15: Testing on a single position is wrong. If you take 20 positions and repeat the test, are the results still the same? /Mikael > >no history: 329876472 >global history: 208352670 (0 calibrations) >local history: 182337306 (29 calibrations) >local history: 162851239 (222 calibrations) >local history: 168449709 (648 calibrations) >local history: 212759140 (4249 calibrations) > >Conclusion: >No calibration smears the table in the long run. >Very frequent calibration throws out too much information. >Optimal for this scheme seems to be somewhere in the middle. > >-S. > > >> >>>-S. >>>>But in any case, I depend on killers for local cutoff moves, and I use history >>>>when all else has failed...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.