Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 05:07:54 03/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 2004 at 04:29:15, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 17, 2004 at 03:59:16, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On March 16, 2004 at 18:58:46, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>See this thread: >>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?354948 >> >>wait, wait... >> >>The continuation Rxf6 Qxf6 Re1 Qf5 Qxf5 gxf5 Bxd5 leads to a better endgame for >>white. If a GM tells me, that this endgame is won for white I believe him right >>away. > >I do not. >This is the mistake of trusting authority. > >GM got their rating because of games otb and not because of being better in >analysis with the help of computers. > >We have no evidence that they know better that somebody who analyzed the >position with computers. > >In case that I analyze the position for many hours(something that I did not do) >I believe that white is winning only if I see some wins against the engines in >this endgame. > >This endgame is also not forced and there are other lines that black can choose >that lead to a similiar endgames. > >Uri This let's me believe that even with a computer you'll never be able to conclude the same thing like a GM could in this position without computer.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.