Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:35:41 03/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 2004 at 11:43:12, Anson T J wrote: >On March 17, 2004 at 10:40:30, Bigler David wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Shredder 8 performed 82 ELO point better than Junior 8 >>Junior 8 performed 82 ELO point better than Shredder 7.04 >> >>So Shredder 8 performed 164 ELO better than Shredder 7.04 >> >>rgds > >I see, I thought when it was -41 / +41 that A was 41 weaker than b and b was 41 >stronger than a. Not that a was 82 weaker and b was 82 stronger. Perhaps you are >correct. thx 56% is less than 50 elo difference based on fast calculation. If the result is 56-44 then I get the following difference in rating (56-44)/100*400=48 so my calculation give 48 elo. The formula that I use is only approximation to the real formula so I guess that 41 is correct and not 82. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.