Author: Bouddha
Date: 09:53:55 03/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 2004 at 12:35:41, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 17, 2004 at 11:43:12, Anson T J wrote: > >>On March 17, 2004 at 10:40:30, Bigler David wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>Shredder 8 performed 82 ELO point better than Junior 8 >>>Junior 8 performed 82 ELO point better than Shredder 7.04 >>> >>>So Shredder 8 performed 164 ELO better than Shredder 7.04 >>> >>>rgds >> >>I see, I thought when it was -41 / +41 that A was 41 weaker than b and b was 41 >>stronger than a. Not that a was 82 weaker and b was 82 stronger. Perhaps you are >>correct. thx > >56% is less than 50 elo difference based on fast calculation. > >If the result is 56-44 then I get the following difference in rating > >(56-44)/100*400=48 so my calculation give 48 elo. > Sorry, but I do not understand why *400 ????????? Please explain > >The formula that I use is only approximation to the real formula so I guess that >41 is correct and not 82. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.