Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 12:33:38 03/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2004 at 23:06:38, Dann Corbit wrote: >On March 16, 2004 at 22:52:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>maybe I missed something, but how does a group of shallow searches show that the >>position is "wrong"??? > >If you read them, it is immediately obvious. > >The game was misplayed, with several gaffes, including a complete blunder. How do you explain Hiarcs 9 and CM9K-SKR finding the solution after some minutes ? http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?354688 http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?354694 Please, let computers think for more than 1 hours before drawing conclusion ... > >The alternative move Qh3 is clearly as good or better than the stated move.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.