Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:37:34 03/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2004 at 23:06:38, Dann Corbit wrote: >On March 16, 2004 at 22:52:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>maybe I missed something, but how does a group of shallow searches show that the >>position is "wrong"??? > >If you read them, it is immediately obvious. > >The game was misplayed, with several gaffes, including a complete blunder. That's OK. The Nolot positions are not about the "games". They are about the positions and the "best" move for each... > >The alternative move Qh3 is clearly as good or better than the stated move. Again, based on what? Some Nolot positions might take _days_ for a program to see the winning move...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.