Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: About history and aging it

Author: Tord Romstad

Date: 16:17:52 03/17/04

Go up one level in this thread

On March 17, 2004 at 16:28:30, Mikael Bäckman wrote:

>I sort moves by:
>
>1. Hash
>2. Good captures
>3. Equal captures
>4. Killers
>5. History
>6. Losing captures

Does this mean that you search losing non-captures before losing captures?  Is
this
really a good idea?

Tord

• Re: About history and aging it Mikael Bäckman 00:17:10 03/18/04
  • Re: About history and aging it Tord Romstad 02:26:51 03/18/04
    • Re: About history and aging it Vasik Rajlich 14:36:07 03/18/04
    • Re: About history and aging it Mikael Bäckman 04:30:03 03/18/04
• Re: About history and aging it Steve Maughan 16:34:41 03/17/04
  • Re: About history and aging it Tord Romstad 02:24:20 03/18/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.