Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:57:49 03/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 2004 at 19:37:40, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On March 17, 2004 at 19:29:00, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On March 17, 2004 at 19:21:53, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On March 17, 2004 at 19:14:47, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On March 17, 2004 at 19:10:23, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 17, 2004 at 14:04:38, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>Dann please don't post comments against someone personally. You already >>>>>supported someone to sue me at a time in my life i was short of money. He >>>>>started sueing me and after 3 years and 2 courtcases later i won the courtcases. >>>> >>>>Who did I tell to sue you? I assure you that I have never done such a thing and >>>>will never propose such nonsense to anyone. >>> >>>You deny ever having posted something which you later removed at CCC? >>> >>>At to be precise 22 december 1999 ? >> >>I have removed several of my posts. What did it say? I can guarantee you that >>it did not say someone should sue you. > >I do not say Michael de la Maza would not have sued me anyway, some types are >like that, but you encouraged him. then when i have emailed you you have removed >the posting. You replaced that posting, around 20-21 december 1999 (i'm 6 hours >ahead of new york time) by something vague then still not clearly trying to >avoid a courtcase though. > >I can still find the court documents where if i remember well he used your >posting also indirectly for the judge. I do not remember what I said, but probably I was joking. It seems incredible to me that someone could use a post from CCC in a court of law. >That's why you emailed me after i had shipped you emails to protest against your >posting and explaining the situation. Read your own words. > >From ???@??? Wed Dec 22 01:32:33 1999 >Received: by sun4000 (mbox diep) > (with Casema's POP3 (v1.0) Wed Dec 22 01:33:16 1999) >X-From_: DCorbit@SolutionsIQ.com Wed Dec 22 01:26:56 1999 >Return-Path: <DCorbit@SolutionsIQ.com> >Received: from smtpf.casema.net (smtpf.casema.net [195.96.96.173]) by >smtp1.casema.net (8.9.1/CASEMA) with SMTP id BAA02365 for ><diep@sun4000.casema.net>; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:26:56 +0100 (MET) >Posted-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:26:56 +0100 (MET) >Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:26:56 +0100 (MET) >Received: (qmail 13701 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 1999 00:26:55 -0000 >Delivered-To: casnet-diep@casema.net >Received: (qmail 13695 invoked by uid 0); 22 Dec 1999 00:26:55 -0000 >Received: from unknown (HELO smtp5.xs4all.nl) (194.109.6.49) > by smtpf.casema.net with SMTP; 22 Dec 1999 00:26:55 -0000 >Received: from maildrop2.xs4all.nl (maildrop2.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.12]) > by smtp5.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA12364 > for <diep@casema.net>; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:26:55 +0100 (CET) >Received: from smtp6.xs4all.nl (smtp6.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.48]) > by maildrop2.xs4all.nl (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id BAA14920 > for <diep@xs4all.nl>; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:26:55 +0100 (CET) >Received: from relay6.smtp.psi.net (relay6.smtp.psi.net [38.9.30.2]) > by smtp6.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA20648 > for <diep@xs4all.nl>; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 01:26:54 +0100 (CET) >Received: from [38.228.97.2] (helo=smtp.solutionsiq.com) > by relay6.smtp.psi.net with esmtp (Exim 1.90 #1) > for diep@xs4all.nl > id 120ZcD-0005UD-00; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 19:26:53 -0500 >Received: by saturn with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) > id <ZGVY7MQR>; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 16:26:43 -0800 >Message-ID: <F6E090846E7FD311AB13080009FB645415BBCD@saturn> >From: Dann Corbit <DCorbit@SolutionsIQ.com> >To: "'Vincent Diepeveen'" <diep@xs4all.nl> >Subject: RE: partial apology >Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 16:26:35 -0800 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="windows-1252" > >No problem. You were right (of course) that my remark was uncalled for. > >BTW, the same guy came to me and asked me to do the job for him [using >public sources]. I'm glad I avoided the mess. I hope you get the whole >thing ironed out soon.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.