Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 17:56:08 03/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 2004 at 20:36:09, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On March 17, 2004 at 20:24:53, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On March 17, 2004 at 20:12:34, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On March 17, 2004 at 19:57:49, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>So you basically say now that nothing you write in CCC by you should be taken >>>serious. >>> >>>That ends of course all discussions. >>> >>>By the way, statements at electronic paper are having the same meaning in court >>>like statements at real paper. The advantage of a forum is that it is easier to >>>proof someone said those words and that not someone else posted them. >> >>I suspect that it is the opposite. With handwriting, it can be analyzed. >>Anyone can post from this workstation, and I log in with my password >>automatically, so anyone can do that too. > >So if you go to court you first deny everything you ever said because it could >be someone else? > >Judges and jury's do not like that. That is not what I said. I said that it would be harder to prove a usenet post than a written document had a certain origination. >>>But I will take your wise words than and follow them regarding your future >>>postings. >> >>Good advice about my postings period. If you expect something of great value or >>of weighty importance, you should definitely look elsewhere. And I can >>definitely be a whinging twit from time to time. >> >>>Note that i did find some postings back, which refute the words you just said >>>here, but i am not here to make a hot fire. My point is clear enough i hope. >> >>If I have ever said something to hurt you, I sincerely apologize for it. > >Well the damage was financially, cheap words cannot make up for it. > >>>Certain people like to post about me. If you post without reasons i might do in >>>future the same chessbase, schroeder, weiner and all chess companies have been >>>doing so much in the past which means full scale war. >> >>I am not sure that I follow you here, but I think confrontation is better to >>avoid than to cause. > >Right i just need 1 reason for a confrontation and i'll take it. that's what i >said. People who look for trouble often end up finding it. A terrible pity, too. I think taking a softer attitude would cause many people to warm to you who do not feel that way now.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.