Author: Mikael Bäckman
Date: 00:17:10 03/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 2004 at 19:17:52, Tord Romstad wrote: >On March 17, 2004 at 16:28:30, Mikael Bäckman wrote: > >>I sort moves by: >> >>1. Hash >>2. Good captures >>3. Equal captures >>4. Killers >>5. History >>6. Losing captures > >Does this mean that you search losing non-captures before losing captures? Is >this >really a good idea? > >Tord I search losing non-captures before losing captures. To fix this, I would need to do an 'opponent-SEE' for all non-captures, which would cost too much, I think. /Mikael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.