Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 08:02:23 03/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 18, 2004 at 10:41:44, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On March 18, 2004 at 04:32:12, Sergei S. Markoff wrote: > >>Hello! >> >>First try to index history depending of piece that moves. It's a "free" >>improvement. I don't know why Crafty not doing it. See me code (it complicated a >>little, but works ok): >> > >It didn't help at all when I tried this. Andm in fact, it hurt because it >increased the "cache footprint" significantly... Do you use a unsigned int[64*64] size table? That's a 16k table, which gets probed constantly. Maybe it will be good for nps (and nodes??) to try with unsigned short[64x7x2] and age only to control overflow? :) -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.