Author: Knight Hawk
Date: 19:16:25 03/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 18, 2004 at 19:25:04, Dann Corbit wrote: >On March 18, 2004 at 19:08:25, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >>I think the 2-best moves mode would be usefull, so we could compare the >>difference between Rxe6 and Qh3 ... > >I am guessing that the differences will be rather small, based on the track I >have been following. I expect that another engine might choose and stay with >the rook move even on deep analysis also. > >I think both moves give a substantial advantage of at least two pawns with >careful play. I felt either move was winning, Rxe6 is what I chose when I looked at it. As a test, would you concur for computers, Rxe6 or Qh3 would both be considered a solution? It appears after all your work, you seem to suggest this. > >>On March 18, 2004 at 18:04:26, Aaron Gordon wrote: >> >>>Duron 800MHz, 128mb hash... >>> >>>[D]2r1r3/p3bk1p/1pnqpppB/3n4/3P2Q1/PB3N2/1P3PPP/3RR1K1 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by Shredder 8: >>> >>>1.Qh3 Rh8 2.Re2 Nd8 3.Nd2 Re8 4.Ne4 Qd7 5.Nc3 Nxc3 6.bxc3 Kg8 7.d5 f5 8.Bf4 exd5 >>>9.Rxd5 >>> +- (2.15) Depth: 21/54 03:09:55 1840331kN >>>1.Qh3 Rg8 2.Re2 Nd8 3.Rde1 Re8 4.Ba4 Rh8 5.Nd2 Nc7 6.Bb3 Qd7 7.Ne4 f5 8.Ng5+ >>> +- (2.33) Depth: 22/58 08:22:06 4877548kN >>>1.Qh3 Rg8 2.Re2 Nd8 3.Rde1 Re8 4.Ba4 Rh8 5.Nd2 f5 6.Bb3 Nf4 7.Bxf4 Qxf4 8.Bxe6+ >>>Nxe6 >>> +- (2.24) Depth: 23/59 15:58:44 9251568kN >>> >>>If deeper analysis is deemed interesting by you guys I'll continue analysis for >>>a longer period of time and provide updates.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.