Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 02:21:44 12/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 1998 at 05:11:29, Harald Faber wrote: >On December 11, 1998 at 05:03:14, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >>>>>Please tell me the exact differences between cm6555 and cm-faber, is cm6555 >>>>>faber\pilz?. >>>>>Thanks.....Dan Kiski >>>> >>>>Well the faber settings I have anf the CM6555 the onlydifference between the two >>>>is that Faber control of center is 90, and CM6555 is100. >>> >>>I can't remember advising CC=90 as it is not in the Walter-Pilz-settings. Where >>>do you have it from? >> >>From a post a few days ago from Dan Kiski, Well I looked at the printout, but >>the settings I have I got off another web site a while ago, so I will check. The >>settings I wrote might not be the ones I have in this tournament that I am >>playing now, I just assumed his setting he gave were correct and were the same >>as mine. > >OK, as I don't have the settings in mind I'll look them after at home this >evening. As I wrote they are the Walter-Pilz-settings plus MCPs piece values. >And if Kai Luebke didn't change s.th. the CC has to be 100 >(http://come.to/SCCS). Read the FAQ about CM5555 because CM5555=CM/Faber/Pilz > >>You did post a follow up to his settings about something, but did not mention >>that the settings he gave were wrong, But I will check the settings I am using > >Check the site I mention above that is why I was wondering. > >>And to be sure can you post your settings for CM6K in this thread so I can >>double check, I do not want to say they are your settings if they are not. > >Personally I have tested some more settings for CM6k and found the >CM-Pilz/Faber-settings as not that satisfying as I have some settings in the >King2.55 so I didn't advice to use the CM4000/5X00-Faber-Pilz-settings in >CM6000. But AFAIK CM6555 is CM6000 with my "old" >CM4000/CM5X00-Faber-Pilz-settings. Well if that is the case then the CM6555 settings that you currently see winning the Chessmaster Tournaments that are being posted are the same as the Faber ones. Then what the hell are the settings for the Other Faber one being played and doing so weak. I checked and I have on my CM-Faber personality in my tournament cc=100, which makes it the same as the CM6555 personality, which is currently doing so well, and the other one called CM-Faber is second last and in the update in my tournament with a few more games played which I have not posted is now last. What the is going on here :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.