Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 02:30:08 12/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 1998 at 04:06:54, Peter Herttrich wrote: >On December 10, 1998 at 23:40:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On December 10, 1998 at 22:52:41, SEAN EVANS wrote: >> >>>On December 10, 1998 at 20:57:29, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On December 09, 1998 at 11:03:50, Peter Klausler wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>I'm unsubscribing. >>>> >>>> >>>>Don't.. that's exactly what he wants. And he gets his way if you walk >>>>away... >>> >>>Moderation Please.... >>> >>>How does Dr. Hyatt presume to *know* what I want... Where are his *facts* to >>>backup his *attack* on me. >>> >>>Thank you for your time and consideration, >>> >>>Best regards, >>> >>>Sean Evans >> >> >> >>There is no attack. There is a request for a member to not leave, just because >>you have been let out of your box for a bit. All you want to do is agitate, >>over and over. One only has to read rec.games.chess.computer to see this form >>of nonsense. I only hope folks are smart enough to not run and hide when such >>nonsense creeps into CCC from time to time. Give the moderators a chance, they >>can curb it... > >I have leaved RGCC completely for this reason. >Now I have to see, that this morons are also here in CCC. >I will see till end of the year, if the community of CCC is able >to throw out this yunk. >I thought, CCC was founded to get rid of this. >Now I see no big difference to RGCC. >When will be the rest of the idiot-collection of RGCC >also here? Personal opinion follows, as I am not the Sean monitor. What I don't understand is why people are calling other people morons and other names, when those other people aren't actually calling anyone names here. It's like there is this assumption that someone is going to be abusive, and people feel like they need to get in some sort of preemptive strike or something. I can understand it, but I hate it. Rolf never posted here once he was let back in, but I bet this sort of thing would have happened in that case, as well. People's emotions are so worked up by one guy that all the guy has to do is say "hello" and it starts a big controversy and they end up being personally attacked over *nothing*. If the target isn't interested in actually causing trouble, it is unfair to them to do this, and if they are, it must amuse them greatly that they can cause trouble by simply expressing existence. I wish that people would collectively get some sense, and realize that they can't hope to attain any sort of moral high ground by thrashing around in the mud, especially if they jump in the mud *first*. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.