Author: Harald Faber
Date: 03:05:43 12/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 1998 at 05:21:44, Micheal Cummings wrote: >>>>>Well the faber settings I have anf the CM6555 the onlydifference between the two >>>>>is that Faber control of center is 90, and CM6555 is100. >>Personally I have tested some more settings for CM6k and found the >>CM-Pilz/Faber-settings as not that satisfying as I have some settings in the >>King2.55 so I didn't advice to use the CM4000/5X00-Faber-Pilz-settings in >>CM6000. But AFAIK CM6555 is CM6000 with my "old" >>CM4000/CM5X00-Faber-Pilz-settings. > >Well if that is the case then the CM6555 settings that you currently see winning >the Chessmaster Tournaments that are being posted are the same as the Faber >ones. That is hw I see this too. >Then what the hell are the settings for the Other Faber one being played and >doing so weak. Don't know. >I checked and I have on my CM-Faber personality in my tournament cc=100, which >makes it the same as the CM6555 personality, which is currently doing so well, >and the other one called CM-Faber is second last and in the update in my >tournament with a few more games played which I have not posted is now last. > >What the is going on here :-) Nothing unusual. A little bit confusion and my settings are best. ;-) However you should rename CM-Faber to CM6555 or vice versa so that there is unity and no more confusion.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.