Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 03:40:24 12/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 1998 at 06:08:55, Harald Faber wrote: >On December 11, 1998 at 05:21:44, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >>Well if that is the case then the CM6555 settings that you currently see winning >>the Chessmaster Tournaments that are being posted are the same as the Faber >>ones. >> >>Then what the hell are the settings for the Other Faber one being played and >>doing so weak. > >That is what YOU have to check. What are YOUR Faber-settings compared to CM6555 >settings? > >>I checked and I have on my CM-Faber personality in my tournament cc=100, which >>makes it the same as the CM6555 personality, which is currently doing so well, >>and the other one called CM-Faber is second last and in the update in my >>tournament with a few more games played which I have not posted is now last. >> >>What the is going on here :-) > >Ah, now I see. You run the same prog twice and get different results. :-)))) >In the Nunn-Test it should not happen, if you have no setup positions for the >games then these results are influenced by the openings. The only difference between the Cm6555 setting and the ones of the CM-Faber one is that CM6555 uses the CM6000 opening book and the CM-faber one uses the Mentor book. Apart from that they are the same in every way.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.