Author: stuart taylor
Date: 19:02:32 03/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 20, 2004 at 20:42:45, John Merlino wrote: >On March 20, 2004 at 20:37:09, stuart taylor wrote: > >>And even if without further improvements in playing strength (but atleast the >>best setting should be the default settings etc. and it should stay ATLEAST as >>strong as it is now, and not do things which risk it getting weaker), can there >>be OTHER improvements of things which I have not yet seen, like a very advanced >>kind of chatter, which comments intelligently on the position, as well as a >>choice of different chatters e.g. 1).highly intelligent 2).humorous 3).humorous >>as well as completely clean! 4).Different combinations of the above. 5) >>encouraging etc. > >A chatter feature would have very little to do with Johan's engine. The engine >provides a PV and that one thing pretty much drives ALL of the current CM >analysis and auto-annotation. All of that text is generated by the CM program as >opposed to Johan's engine. > >>Also, a finely tuned estimation of playing strength according to your games, but >>not based only on percentage of won, lost, drawn etc. > >What...you mean like a rating? :-) > >jm Yes. Like a true rating, not dependent on statistics of W/L/D S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.