Author: John Merlino
Date: 20:58:00 03/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 20, 2004 at 22:02:32, stuart taylor wrote: >On March 20, 2004 at 20:42:45, John Merlino wrote: > >>On March 20, 2004 at 20:37:09, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>And even if without further improvements in playing strength (but atleast the >>>best setting should be the default settings etc. and it should stay ATLEAST as >>>strong as it is now, and not do things which risk it getting weaker), can there >>>be OTHER improvements of things which I have not yet seen, like a very advanced >>>kind of chatter, which comments intelligently on the position, as well as a >>>choice of different chatters e.g. 1).highly intelligent 2).humorous 3).humorous >>>as well as completely clean! 4).Different combinations of the above. 5) >>>encouraging etc. >> >>A chatter feature would have very little to do with Johan's engine. The engine >>provides a PV and that one thing pretty much drives ALL of the current CM >>analysis and auto-annotation. All of that text is generated by the CM program as >>opposed to Johan's engine. >> >>>Also, a finely tuned estimation of playing strength according to your games, but >>>not based only on percentage of won, lost, drawn etc. >> >>What...you mean like a rating? :-) >> >>jm > >Yes. Like a true rating, not dependent on statistics of W/L/D >S.Taylor The rating in Chessmaster is calculated just like any other chess rating. Percentage of games won/lost/drawn has nothing to do with it. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.