Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: For: Stu

Author: Johan de Koning

Date: 22:49:48 03/20/04

Go up one level in this thread


On March 20, 2004 at 20:37:09, stuart taylor wrote:

>And even if without further improvements in playing strength (but atleast the
>best setting should be the default settings etc. and it should stay ATLEAST as
>strong as it is now, and not do things which risk it getting weaker), can there
>be OTHER improvements of things which I have not yet seen, like a very advanced
>kind of chatter, which comments intelligently on the position, as well as a
>choice of different chatters e.g. 1).highly intelligent 2).humorous 3).humorous
>as well as completely clean! 4).Different combinations of the above. 5)
>encouraging etc.

I think you'll find 1)...5) right here in this forum. :-)

>Also, a finely tuned estimation of playing strength according to your games, but
>not based only on percentage of won, lost, drawn etc.

That's tough.
As far as *playing* strength goes we don't have anything better than
Elo's statistical model. Insight, fighting spirit, distractions, and
not the least physical fitness, are all thrown at one heap. But then
again, that *is* what defines playing strength in the real world.

... Johan



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.