Author: Johan de Koning
Date: 22:57:52 03/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 20, 2004 at 23:58:00, John Merlino wrote: >On March 20, 2004 at 22:02:32, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On March 20, 2004 at 20:42:45, John Merlino wrote: >> >>>On March 20, 2004 at 20:37:09, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>>>And even if without further improvements in playing strength (but atleast the >>>>best setting should be the default settings etc. and it should stay ATLEAST as >>>>strong as it is now, and not do things which risk it getting weaker), can there >>>>be OTHER improvements of things which I have not yet seen, like a very advanced >>>>kind of chatter, which comments intelligently on the position, as well as a >>>>choice of different chatters e.g. 1).highly intelligent 2).humorous 3).humorous >>>>as well as completely clean! 4).Different combinations of the above. 5) >>>>encouraging etc. >>> >>>A chatter feature would have very little to do with Johan's engine. The engine >>>provides a PV and that one thing pretty much drives ALL of the current CM >>>analysis and auto-annotation. All of that text is generated by the CM program as >>>opposed to Johan's engine. >>> >>>>Also, a finely tuned estimation of playing strength according to your games, but >>>>not based only on percentage of won, lost, drawn etc. >>> >>>What...you mean like a rating? :-) >>> >>>jm >> >>Yes. Like a true rating, not dependent on statistics of W/L/D >>S.Taylor > >The rating in Chessmaster is calculated just like any other chess rating. >Percentage of games won/lost/drawn has nothing to do with it. I'm afraid something went wrong in this thread. :-) ... Johan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.