Author: stuart taylor
Date: 02:43:49 03/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 21, 2004 at 01:57:52, Johan de Koning wrote: >On March 20, 2004 at 23:58:00, John Merlino wrote: > >>On March 20, 2004 at 22:02:32, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>On March 20, 2004 at 20:42:45, John Merlino wrote: >>> >>>>On March 20, 2004 at 20:37:09, stuart taylor wrote: >>>> >>>>>And even if without further improvements in playing strength (but atleast the >>>>>best setting should be the default settings etc. and it should stay ATLEAST as >>>>>strong as it is now, and not do things which risk it getting weaker), can there >>>>>be OTHER improvements of things which I have not yet seen, like a very advanced >>>>>kind of chatter, which comments intelligently on the position, as well as a >>>>>choice of different chatters e.g. 1).highly intelligent 2).humorous 3).humorous >>>>>as well as completely clean! 4).Different combinations of the above. 5) >>>>>encouraging etc. >>>> >>>>A chatter feature would have very little to do with Johan's engine. The engine >>>>provides a PV and that one thing pretty much drives ALL of the current CM >>>>analysis and auto-annotation. All of that text is generated by the CM program as >>>>opposed to Johan's engine. >>>> >>>>>Also, a finely tuned estimation of playing strength according to your games, but >>>>>not based only on percentage of won, lost, drawn etc. >>>> >>>>What...you mean like a rating? :-) >>>> >>>>jm >>> >>>Yes. Like a true rating, not dependent on statistics of W/L/D >>>S.Taylor >> >>The rating in Chessmaster is calculated just like any other chess rating. >>Percentage of games won/lost/drawn has nothing to do with it. > >I'm afraid something went wrong in this thread. :-) > >... Johan Percentage of W/L/D IS the normal way, I thought too. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.