Author: Harald Faber
Date: 04:40:28 12/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 1998 at 07:31:55, Micheal Cummings wrote: >Fine that it has good database and all the bells and whistles you want, that >CM6K does not have. >But deep down when you use it to play chess and analyse games, you will think >from all that you read on CCC about CM6K being the strong and maybe the >strongest, you will think to yourself, well this is great, I have all the best >features I want in a program, but I do not have the best engine to go along with >it.That is sitting in a cheap CM6K program. And those people are going to hate >that. IMHO Fritz/Junior has the best analysis features beside Rebel. For blundercheck and database analysis get one of them or even both. If you STUDY chess, analyze a little longer some positions or need a good hint for your correspondence game, then use MCP, Hiarcs or the King. >I want a strong and the best engine. I really doubt that the serious player >would use all database functions in everyone of the many programs they have. Not the database functions but the analysis functions. And concerning strength, I repeat myself: all engines have the same strength. You would see that if you play >500 games each between the TOP10 programs (incl. the King of course). They only differ in style.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.