Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 09:29:36 12/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 1998 at 06:15:16, Harald Faber wrote: >Against a computer it wouldn't have worked, there are not enough weaknesses in >the white position. Here the human obviously blundered in a blitz game, that is >nothing unusual. rnbq1rk1/pp1p1ppp/2p2n2/4p1B1/1bP5/2NP2P1/PP2PPBP/R2QK1NR b KQ - 1 6 I am not saying that the sacrifice is sound. But it is a real sacrifice, and it's interesting to figure out why it thought it had compensation. It may have worked against a computer, it's hard to tell. The opponent blundered, no doubt, but computers have a knack for giving you large compensation when you have small compensation. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.