Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Mchess8 opinions

Author: Thom Perry

Date: 14:40:06 12/11/98

Go up one level in this thread


On December 11, 1998 at 13:14:51, Dan Kiski wrote:

>Am interested in any mchess8 owners opinions of the program, particularly it's
>strengths and weaknesses.

I like MCP8 real well because the program is neat and clean.  It doesn't
have a lot of "bells and whistles".  I've seen literally hundreds of
messages on this board debating the merits of different setups for CM6,
Rebel, etc.  And whose to say what the ultimate setup really is?  With
MCP8, you just fire up the program and go.  The display, which includes the
board, pieces, moves, evaluations, etc. is crisp and easy to follow.  The
program is a joy to watch as it thinks.  And with MCP8, you have a
systematic procedure for crippling its strength to make it playable.  And
if you do score, the program takes into account it's playing level when
it calculates your rating.  For me, since my primary interests are a good
sparring partner and someone to help me evaluate interesting positions,
MCP8 fits the bill.  If I were heavy into databases and theoretical
setups, then I would look elsewhere for another program.  Oh, and as I'm
sure you have already heard, it plays a real mean game against humans!



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.