Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 18:48:40 03/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 26, 2004 at 18:10:36, Bryan Hofmann wrote: >On March 26, 2004 at 12:30:40, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On March 26, 2004 at 07:26:54, Bryan Hofmann wrote: >> >>>On March 25, 2004 at 16:02:43, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On March 25, 2004 at 12:28:08, Bryan Hofmann wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 25, 2004 at 10:39:36, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I started a match of 10 games at G/90 between Gothmog 0.4.7 vs Fritz 6 and Fritz >>>>>>6 is losing 4.5 to 1.5 so far; and even if Fritz 6 win the remaining games >>>>>>which I doubt, Gothmog is having either too much luck or Fritz 6 is NOT as >>>>>>strong as I thought. >>>>>> >>>>>>Jorge >>>>> >>>>>You might want to take a look at this program; >>>>> >>>>>http://www.stevemaughan.com/whoisbetter.htm >>>> >>>> >>>>>Dude you're Drunk! Fritz6 would slaughter these engines hands down!. >>>> >>>>I only wanted to prove to Larry that it was not as easy as he thought; all these >>>>programs Ruffian 1.0.1, Delfi 4.4, El Chinito 3.25, Thinker 4.5e, and Gothmog >>>>are almost a la par with Fritz 6 and some of these programs are even stronger. >>>> >>>> >>>>Yes but I thought that if Mighty Fritz 6 is significantly stronger than any of >>>>the programs that I mentioned early the score after 8 games would have been the >>>>other way around. Instead of Gothmog winning 5.5 to 2.5 it should have been >>>>Fritz 6 winning by the same margin. >>>> >>>> >>>>Jorge >>> >>>The reason I pointed you to this program is that it shows you in 10 games you >>>are really proving nothing. >> >> >> >>It could be , but that is not the way I see it. If I am rated 2000 and I play an >>opponent which is weaker than I am by 100 points. After ten games, I should be >>able to make a statement unless I am playing him completely drunk, the weaker >>player should not be able to beat me 75% of the times out of 10 games. Now with >>programs it could happen that one program will win 5 games in a row and then the >>other will take turn if they are of equal strength or close enough within 50 >>rating points. But I do believe that 10 games give us an indication of how close >>a program is to another program by looking at the percentage. >> >>PS: It doesn't proof that the program that won by 6.5 to 3.5 in the first 10 >>games is stronger than the program that lost the small match, but at least it >>gives us a clue that the program that won is very close or within 50 rating >>points from the loser (Fritz 6) >> >> >>Jorge > >You can belive what ever you like. The fact is you are proving your self wrong >when you take a look at the stats for your 30 min games with Fritz and Gothmog. >It is a simple fact that you can not say with any certainty one program is >stronger/better then the other with 10 matches. Why don't you take a pick between El Chinito 3.25, Aristach 4.41, Thinker 4.5e Smarthink 0.17a, or Gothmog 0.47 and match it against Fritz 6 at longer time control = or > than G/90 and since you need at least 100 games to be convinced. Simply go for it! PS: You don't need 100 rounds against Mike Tyson to convince you that he will beat the !@#$%^$&& out of you, simply fight against him 10 little rounds and I will be the first to pay $1000 to see him do it :-) Jorge Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.