Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 08:10:52 03/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 26, 2004 at 19:35:43, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On March 26, 2004 at 18:09:28, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On March 26, 2004 at 17:51:12, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>Gothmog 0.4.7 is not doing so great in blitz G/30 against Fritz 6, after 18 >>>games Fritz 6 is winning by 13 to 5. >> >>And here is your post from yesterday: >> >>"I started a match of 10 games at G/90 between Gothmog 0.4.7 vs Fritz 6 and >>Fritz 6 is losing 4.5 to 1.5 so far; and even if Fritz 6 win the remaining >>games which I doubt, Gothmog is having either too much luck or Fritz 6 is NOT as >>strong as I thought." >> >>Where it was decided that Fritz 6 was not so strong. >> >>So why don't we wait for 30 games to get a real inkling of how strong the two >>programs are in reference to each other? >> >> >>BTW, if Fritz is learning and Gothmog is not, it may eventually lean to 100% >>victories for Fritz. How to interpret that result would be up to you, of >>course. > >My only conclusion is that Fritz 6 is better at shorter time control < than 60 >minutes per side. I still think that If I return to the G/90 Gothmog 0.4.7 will >continue on beating Fritz 6. > I doubt that. Play 50 games and you will see, that Fritz 6 plays Gothmog on whatever time control you want. >PS: It doesn't has nothing to do with Fritz 6 learning more than Gothmog. If you >look at my initial post, I said that Gothmog 0.4.7, El Chinito 3.25, Delfi 4.4, >and Thinker 4.5e are as strong as commercial programs were back from 1999 to >2001. The commercial programs that I thought that were almost equal in strength >at longer time control are: Fritz 6, Junior 6, Hiarcs 6, Shredder 5.32 > >Jorge.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.