Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 19:30:19 12/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 1998 at 22:21:53, Mark Young wrote: >On December 11, 1998 at 18:59:02, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >> >>Great series of games James >> >>You decided yet on who CM6K is going to beat next. I would try and play the >>CM-6555 game settings which are very strong, and I have found 40 - 50% !!! >>Stronger than the standard settings so far. > >I would keep playing the default settings. I know the setting we are finding >have shown go results playing CM default at fast time controls. We should not >yet assume they are best overall at all time controls, and at playing other >programs. I would keep playing the default settings untill you can find a >program that beats CM 6000. Then we can test other setting against that program. > >Right now I am just getting a collection of possible stronger settings then >default. I have not yet started true testing. I think we can not say this >setting is better then default until we play many programs at long time controls >and compare it with the default CM6K settings. So James is saving us much time >by playing default settings, and I thank him for it. I totally agree with you, I was thinking more along the lines of playing a few games just to see what would happen at those time control. At the moment of my other computer with the same hardware as I played my current topurnament on. My new settings in 20 games are winning over the cm6555 settings by 14:6, which has blown me away so far, but I am making them play at least 40 games between each other, and if the results are still impressive I will post my test settings for that personality.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.