Author: stegner, jamie
Date: 22:56:39 03/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
acc. to their resumes. stuart regards himself as the original author; while john does not. if memory serves me right, john once called(or let it be called) his work "gnuchess 2". my rationale on this question is: HOW CAN ANYONE BE REGARDED AS THE ORiGiNAL AUTHOR WITHOUT ANY PROGRAM OR SOURCE FILE AVAILABLE ON THE NET AND NO BODY HAS EVER CLAIMED HE'S SEEN A COPY OR HE OWNS ONE. as u know various doc files included in gnuchess packages are writtten by john. maybe he posted them w/ other gnuchess files; and i have never read nor found any doc file on gnuchess programming skills written by stuart. but many packages attribute (c) to stuart cracraft. john stanback, daryl baker, mike mcgann... why he is the first on the list? was stuart's result was UN-offical? it really existed as working program? PS) imho, without regard to (c) notices, the 1st on the list should be john. best // jamie
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.