Author: Steven Edwards
Date: 00:40:28 03/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 2004 at 18:55:53, Artem Pyatakov wrote: >>My thought is that the better idea is to use chess knowledge extensively at the >>start of a search instead of applying the knowledge to a search that threatens >>to grow out of control. An ounce of prevention is worth 453 grams of cure. > >Could you give more details on what you mean here? I know there have been many >efforts to do selective search - including a famous one by Botvinnik, none of >which have resulted in very competitive programs (despite great chess prowess of >the authors). What are you doing differently? What do you think these others >have missed? What kinds of results have you gotten? In regard to Botvinnik's Pioneer, it was at best vaporware and at worst a complete and intentional fake. For comments on my current effort, try searching this forum for the word "symbolic".
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.