Author: Jeroen van Dorp
Date: 12:40:36 03/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 29, 2004 at 15:18:15, Brian Kostick wrote: >I'm in favor of silent moderation, as far as in what the average board reader >sees. It's seems appropriate that offensive posters gets a warning email and >perhaps a chace to talk things over with the moderators when necessay. > >Anyway that's neither here nor there, just my opinion. Thanks to the moderators >for doing such thankless tasks for us. BK You know, I agree with you, and yet I disagree at the same time. I found it a neat thing finding the whole thread disappearing without even a puff of smoke. Not to fire off an endless discussion, but... ...OTOH it shouldn't be like the pictures from the old Sovjet Union, where people where cut away without a word, sometimes only there shadows remaining :) It's no problem to have spam or abuse aboard, to deal with it, to wipe it, and to indicate openly that it has been wiped, and why. It's always good for everyone to know how "the judicial system" in an open community works, even if it's in such a simple place like a message board as this. J.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.