Author: Renze Steenhuisen
Date: 06:41:24 04/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 31, 2004 at 23:36:05, Jon Dart wrote: >On March 31, 2004 at 12:35:21, Renze Steenhuisen wrote: > > >>Me too, can't find it... I am using sources :-) But what I really would like to >>have is a good description of which techniques together cause a FH-% of 90-95% >>And I can't find it... soo... > >Well, Arasan does the following move ordering (regular >search, not quiescence): > >1. Hash move >2. Winning captures >3. Killer moves (2) >4. History moves (top 2) >5. All remaining non-capture moves >6. Losing captures > >and it is getting 90%+ on almost all positions. Well, OK I will try that... why not use HH on all non-captures (and under-promotions)? Is it _THAT_ much faster to just find the two best HH values instead of sorting them all according to their HH-value? Renze
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.