Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 11:33:25 12/12/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 1998 at 09:24:06, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >On December 12, 1998 at 09:12:02, Terry Presgrove wrote: > >>On December 12, 1998 at 05:03:57, Micheal Cummings wrote: >> >>>In the first post to announce moderators nominations, I think I read that the >>>people being nominated where going to write a few words on how the CCC would be >>>moderated by them. >>> >>>I am very interested and want to hear from the nominated people their views in >>>order I can choose the ones I like, is that going to happen. >>> >>>Because from a few postings of late I think the moderators now are not currently >>>doing what the CCC charter tells us. >>> >>>If someone can tell me when this will happen I will grateful. >>> >>>Regards >>> >>>Micheal >> >> I agree it would be good to here from the candidates before the election. >> I do disagree about the CCC charter issue.......personaly I have seen very few >> offensive posts of late that warrant moderator attention ......if this a forum >> of ideas, communication will always bring about certain amount of disagreement. >> While its true that disagrreement is judged much by whose goose is being >> cooked, in the main I've thought the current moderators have done an >>outstanding job...... > > >I agree, they have done a great job, But the main part of the charter I am >refering too is that of being free from personal attacks. I think that is the >main problem for the moderators on here, and I believe it should be more >forcefully enforced. I agree with this last paragraph. > >I think a thread posted just recently should be removed, its heading is a >personal attack and I believe not part of computer chess. Yes, I agree 100%. I have been nominated to be a moderator, if it were within my power I certainly would have removed the post titled 'To reynolds takata a weak master' for the reasons you outlined. > >Even if there is one sentence related in a post, if it contains an unwarranted >personal attack then that post should be removed. > >That is why I want to hear from the nominated moderators to see what their views >on things like this are, and how they should be treated, or just let things like >this happen, then you might as well change the charter and get back to r.g.c.c >which I have never looked at, but I hear is a very unlimited place in what you >can say or do. > >Personally I do not want to read people having jibes at each other, I know I >have responded to some aimed at me from replies I have made to some things, but >I am now going to try not too, it is not worth the stress.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.