Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: which 6 man tablebases are the most important?

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 06:21:23 04/03/04

Go up one level in this thread


On April 02, 2004 at 23:22:20, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On April 02, 2004 at 18:17:23, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On April 02, 2004 at 17:56:58, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On April 02, 2004 at 16:22:19, Jonas Bylund wrote:
>>>
>>>>Thank you very much for your detailed answers!
>>>>
>>>>When you say Diep already runs in windows mode, does that mean that it runs DOS
>>>>or "real" windows mode? (sorry about not being clear on that in my original
>>>>post)
>>>>
>>>>10GB for all the 3+4+5+6 tb's would be a HUGE success as would 20GB of course!
>>>
>>>It is also "vaporware".  3-4-5-6 tables will _not_ fit into 10 gigabytes.
>>
>>Yes but it is possible that tables that are enough to play 3-4-5-6 perfectly may
>>fit 10 gigabytes.
>>
>>Suppose that you have tables that have only 1/32 of the information in the
>>original 6-piece tables(it has information about exact distance to mate only if
>>the index of the position is divisible by 32).
>
>Do the math.  Current tables will likely go well over 1.5 terabytes.  Shrink to
>10 gigabytes means well over 2 orders of magnitude reduction.  If the 6's fit in
>1.5 which is not yet a given.
>
>>
>>You can still use them in 1/32 of the positions in case that the index of the
>>position is in the table.
>>
>>In case that the index of the position is not divisible by 32 you can search
>>forward and in order to check if the index of the position is divisble by 32 you
>>do not need to look at the table.
>>
>>Now the question is if programs who use the smaller tables can practically play
>>6-piece positions perfectly or cannot do it.
>>
>>Uri
>
>You reduce a single position to 1.6 bits from 8-16 bits.  A reduction of 10 at
>best.  You are now down to 150 gigabytes if you are lucky.  Reduce it further
>and there is information loss.  I can't deal with a group of positions that
>might be mate in anything from 1 to 32.

I'll bet $100 right now we never see the 3-7 man tablebases in a 10G format
which actually work.  Does anyone here actually know this guy?  For several
years now I have read his post and suspected he is a heavy drinker.  If that's
not the case then he really has no excuse for his nonsense.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.