Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 09:48:00 04/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 02, 2004 at 23:17:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: DIEP raw compressed format : 28-03-2004 02:15 218.108 kqqqkp_w.dtb.emd 28-03-2004 02:14 134.072 kqqqkp_b.dtb.emd Same tables in nalimov format: -rw-r--r-- 1 500 500 650212520 Sep 11 2003 kqqqkp.nbb.emd -rw-r--r-- 1 500 500 115294214 Sep 11 2003 kqqqkp.nbw.emd Factor 1000 compression or so here. >On April 02, 2004 at 19:02:42, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On April 02, 2004 at 17:56:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On April 02, 2004 at 16:22:19, Jonas Bylund wrote: >>> >>>>Thank you very much for your detailed answers! >>>> >>>>When you say Diep already runs in windows mode, does that mean that it runs DOS >>>>or "real" windows mode? (sorry about not being clear on that in my original >>>>post) >>>> >>>>10GB for all the 3+4+5+6 tb's would be a HUGE success as would 20GB of course! >>> >>>It is also "vaporware". 3-4-5-6 tables will _not_ fit into 10 gigabytes. >> >>For how much are we going to bet that w/d/l tables 3-6 men fit in 10GB? >> >>It's a bit of work i'll admit it as all 5 vs 1 still must get generated which is >>what i'll do after world champs 2004, provided i can get a machine from someone >>to do it. >> >>Compressing those is pretty easy though. It's all wins or illegal positions >>(also wins in diep's definition). >> >>In total it's 510 EGTB's, a bit less than 1020 files (KRPKRP for example is 1 >>file and not 2). >> > >Talk is cheap. You have been reporting on how much smaller your tables are, how >much faster you can generate them, how much better you compress them, how much >less memory your generator requires, since Bruce started generating tables when >everyone had started to use the Edwards tables. You have yet to show anybody >anything _real_. I doubt you ever will. Of course, you will probably continue >to talk about them for the next 10 years... > >Meanwhile using Eugene's tables which _do_ exist... > > > >>> >>>> >>>>I am not implying that we all have a similar standard when it comes to giving >>>>our work away, but people who know me fairly well, knows that if they need >>>>anything, that be music, webdesign, painting, ideas etc.all they need to do is >>>>ask and i will provide it for free if i have the time. Not too long ago someone >>>>saw one of my paintings (he lives in USA) and really liked one particular >>>>painting and i sent it to him free of charge, - shipping charges. >>>>I can say that giving without asking anything in return is _extremely_ >>>>liberating, but if that dosn't do it for you, i respect that too. >>> >>> >>>Some will _never_ grasp that concept... >> >>You get paid to browse a bit and let the 80s revive in classrooms. >> >>Not that i ever would like to be in your shoes, but that has other reasons. > >Yes, such as you would likely be unable to complete one of my courses, since I >don't give high marks for vaporware, handwaving, and other such similar >nonsense... > >Of course that didn't stop you from asking hundreds of email questions when you >started to think about parallel search. Your credibility continues to >plummet...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.