Author: Paul
Date: 22:11:39 12/12/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 1998 at 18:07:30, Raul Kukk wrote: >I agree with you its interesting position.Y tried to make quick analice with >Genius3.This program also dont find out the right move 23.b3!main variant goes >on23. ...c3 24.Nc3 bc 25.Rc3 Kb8 26.Qc2 then Genius find better 26. ...Qd7 after >27.Ba7 Kb7 28.Bc5(28.Rac1!?)Bc5 29.Rc5 Rc5 30.Qc5 Kc7 31.Qc4 Rb8 32.h4 Qd2(32. >...Qd6 33.h4 Rb4 34.Qc2 e5 35.h5=)33.Ra7 Rb7 34.Rb7 Kb7 35.Qb5 Kc7 36.Qh5 Qe1 >37.Kg2 Ne5 38.f4 Qe4 39.Kh2 Nf3 40.Kh3= . Again of cource best move is 23.b3! >but probably it gives only draw.But G.K. has may be other opinion.Thx for nice >position! R.K. Hi, from my personal experience, CM5K wins most games against Fritz 5, but I play typically 2 hour games. I hear CM is not as good at blizt. Read comment made by Lanny DiBartolomeo: And your basing this on a cm2000 program (which is a totally different engine) and 1chess position from GM kasparov that cm6000 couldnt find? I can come up with plenty of examples in which it can find, as a matter of fact there was a post of a position in which fritz5 didnt find and cm6000 and rebel10 found. No one said that cm6000 finds all the moves no one, not even GMkasparov could. But I do Know about static advantages and dynamic play and i know most people here do! And cm6000 plays very well it plays the position and what the position calls for it will find a majority of the time be it static or dynamic it has given exchange sacs on me a number of times and continued with play why? not because it saw it would win back material but it created enough pressure on the board for the sac! SO, sorry but you are not talking about the same program i play against.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.