Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Silent moderation

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 08:02:03 04/05/04

Go up one level in this thread


On April 05, 2004 at 06:53:05, J. Kazinski wrote:

>>I don't think so, i had the same thought as Mike is expressing:
>>"Your posts about "spotting cheaters" on online chess is actually a >transparent shrill for an advocacy group that is promoting online
>>cheating Jonas (a reader)
>
>Well, some people consider the GWB pretzel choke incident a transparent shrill
>for an advocacy group that is promoting US suppression and violating human
>rights in the middle east. Still no reason for CNN to censor GWB.

CNN is not demonstrating how to create suicide bombs, what ingredients are
needed and how you can kill the most people with the smallest amount of efforts.
Having been in some political platforms, i know how to cripple a country without
too much problems, and realizing that the politics have neglected to protect it,
so everybody could possible do it.

Do you see any posts of me anywhere what i mean and how to executed it?

Of course not. That will give terrorrists an excellent example of how to cripple
a modern western country within a week.

Not you.

You are demonstrating something no one had thought of and even writing out in
detail how to do it.

You should be banned for life!






This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.