Author: Jonas Bylund
Date: 12:03:00 04/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 05, 2004 at 06:53:05, J. Kazinski wrote: >>I don't think so, i had the same thought as Mike is expressing: >>"Your posts about "spotting cheaters" on online chess is actually a >transparent shrill for an advocacy group that is promoting online >>cheating Jonas (a reader) > >Well, some people consider the GWB pretzel choke incident a transparent shrill >for an advocacy group that is promoting US suppression and violating human >rights in the middle east. Still no reason for CNN to censor GWB. That has nothing to do with my opinion... you said that it should be up to the readers to judge for themselves and as a reader i just informed you that i agreed with mikes thoughts even before he posted them, because i had the same thought when i read your post on online cheaters i just expressed that. You obviously don't care for reader feedback, infact i find it interesting that you have had 2 moderator warnings, several readers like myself telling you to stop these cheating topics, yet you keep on like you don't care. What do you hope to gain from this? Well my guess is that it is somewhat similar to what spammers are hoping to gain; spread your "product" to as big an audience as possible in the hopes a few people will find it interesting. Now if i am wrong about this, you would of course, after all this negative feedback from the readers, apologize and start participating in on-topic postings about computer chess, if not then it is clear what your intentions are...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.