Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CM 6000 Analysis of Chess Position????

Author: Laurence Chen

Date: 00:38:51 12/13/98

Go up one level in this thread


On December 12, 1998 at 21:57:28, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote:

>And your basing this on a cm2000 program (which is a totally different engine)
>and 1chess position from GM kasparov that cm6000 couldnt find? I can come up
>with plenty of examples in which it can find, as a matter of fact there was a
>post of a position in which fritz5 didnt find and cm6000 and rebel10 found.
>No one said that cm6000 finds all the moves no one, not even GMkasparov could.
>But I do Know about static advantages and dynamic play and i know most people
>here do! And cm6000 plays very well it plays the position and what the position
>calls for it will find a majority of the time be it static or dynamic it has
>given exchange sacs on me a number of times and continued with play why? not
>because it saw it would win back material but it created enough pressure on the
>board for the sac! SO, sorry but you are not talking about the same program i
>play against.
Sorry, I am basing this on my copy of CM 6000, all I said is that I have
previous copies of CM, since the early beginning, and that was the style the
engine played, and it has been improved since. All chess engines are prisoners
of the style or heuristics that the programmer designed. Of course there are
positions that CM 6000 will find the right move and Fritz 5.16 will fail, I said
that in my posting, and I said that in positions which static elements are
predominant CM will find the right move, however, in complex positions, which
dynamic elements and hidden resources are present, CM 6000 will fail to find the
right plan, and Fritz will find the right one. My point was, one must not be
blind in using only one chess engine to analyze a chess position, but one must
consider the type of position then apply the appropriate one. It is like
penicilin being misused in the medical field, at one time it was thought to be a
miracle drug, and a lot of doctors prescribed to its patients, now it is
alarming to find that some bacterias are becoming immune to penicilin due to the
abuse of the drug, that is, over prescription of the use of the drug when it was
not needed. So the same happens when one becomes blind to one type of chess
engine. If you want to improve your game in chess, you must be flexible.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.