Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: which 6 man tablebases are the most important?

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 15:58:17 04/06/04

Go up one level in this thread


On April 06, 2004 at 18:40:38, margolies,marc wrote:

>Hi Sune,
>What you say is certainly true. But I am afraid you are posing a different
>argument than the first time.

Yes I have many arguments :)

>Originally you said no one wants to be beaten by shredder 20  times in a row.
>Now it is the features are too expensive.

Why spend a lot of money to get a really strong program and then weaken it?

I mean it's cool it has that feature, but is it hardly a selling argument when
you can get natively weak engines for free.

>Here's the facts-- shredder download costs 30 dollars usa, it includes the
>'oracle' which is 6-piece savy, and a great interface-- it IS usable by a
>beginner and 'classic' shredder costs the same as cm9k. the s8 engine in the
>chessbase distribution is stronger, I am told--but you a get good uci engine in
>the new package and a sandro necci opening book. there's no chess playing server
>client however.
>best regards-marc

Ok, but you know exactly what you are doing and you are aware of the
alternatives.

Buying Shredder to a 7 year old would just be completely overkill IMO.

Of course if you are a serious player and trying to out-analyze your opponent,
then the best will not be good enough.

-S.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.