Author: Renze Steenhuisen
Date: 07:57:29 04/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2004 at 10:48:23, Renze Steenhuisen wrote: > >>>>>>I'm sure it was some implementation bug with Renze. > >Anyone, > >I only store result from the main search, so no NULL-move and no Qsearch >results. >I get a TT-hit ratio of 11.73%, of which a part will generate cut-offs. > (I call something a tt-hit when an entry is found with the same hashkey, > draft does not need to be sufficient) > >the tt_retrieve code retrieves a move, which I call the TT_MOVE_SUGGESTION. > >could someone provide me with a % of TT_MOVE_SUGGESTIONs in a search? > >Cheers... Hmmm, that's weird... when I disable the IID code, I get an even higher number of errors... How important is it to hash in the castling rights and en-passant fields? it can't be THAT important can it? because I am just testing everything with the startig position only (yes, I know it isn't wise but I have no choice due to time constraints) ... BuG BuG BuG
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.