Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 08:19:21 04/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2004 at 10:48:23, Renze Steenhuisen wrote: > >>>>>>I'm sure it was some implementation bug with Renze. > >Anyone, > >I only store result from the main search, so no NULL-move and no Qsearch >results. Of course i store nullmove and qsearch. Saves me at leat 50% (if % is a good term, because it will have of course an exponential effect in the long run). >I get a TT-hit ratio of 11.73%, of which a part will generate cut-offs. That's very high, i'm around 3-5%. > (I call something a tt-hit when an entry is found with the same hashkey, > draft does not need to be sufficient) > >the tt_retrieve code retrieves a move, which I call the TT_MOVE_SUGGESTION. > >could someone provide me with a % of TT_MOVE_SUGGESTIONs in a search? They work very well. >Cheers...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.