Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 08:21:51 04/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2004 at 10:54:40, Tony Werten wrote: >On April 07, 2004 at 10:48:23, Renze Steenhuisen wrote: > >> >>>>>>>I'm sure it was some implementation bug with Renze. >> >>Anyone, >> >>I only store result from the main search, so no NULL-move and no Qsearch >>results. >>I get a TT-hit ratio of 11.73%, of which a part will generate cut-offs. >> (I call something a tt-hit when an entry is found with the same hashkey, >> draft does not need to be sufficient) > >Hmm, I'm sorry but that's way too low. You probably have a problem with your >hashkey. > >In XiniX I get a hitrate of at least 60% in normal search, >20% in qsearch. >Tony It heavily depends upon what type of extensions you do. If you use for example singular extensions the shape of the tree is way different from not using them. >>the tt_retrieve code retrieves a move, which I call the TT_MOVE_SUGGESTION. >> >>could someone provide me with a % of TT_MOVE_SUGGESTIONs in a search? >> >>Cheers...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.